(09-10-2016 05:38 PM)Kayla Woodrunner Wrote: Here is another proof that proves Galaxy Burst is dominant to Galaxy Star. This is a chart from Morgan. She gave me permission to post it.
![[Image: 93ea604ad19c6b6f1946e617b2a936ad.png]](https://gyazo.com/93ea604ad19c6b6f1946e617b2a936ad.png)
Thinking about all this made me realize since we proved Inia's charts were pure, we are just reconfirming Galaxy Burst is dominant to Galaxy Star. I know a couple people who said people are arguing with them that Galaxy Burst is recessive to Galaxy Star -- I wish thsoe people would come on the forum -- I bet their charts will show Galaxy Star was used to pull the Galaxy Burst. The initial charts are pretty irrefutable.
Another great proof that coupled with Inias clearly shows Star as recessive to Burst, however as always we would need to see the proof both Galaxy Star parents hid it in an uncontaminated line before those that insist burst is recessive will believe it. Personally seeing the breeders involved theres no doubt in my mind that Morgans Star is pure.
Only way to prove to them Burst is dominant to star is to pull star from 2 Bursts. If anyone stumbles across a chart like that please do share
As Kayla said we are only confirming a irrefutable proof at this point so the whole arguement is kinda frustrating for those of us that can see it.
