|
|
Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
|
07-18-2016, 12:11 PM
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
I don't know her. It was in KittyCats group notice at that time when the eyes were discovered the first time.
(07-18-2016 09:46 AM)Kayla Woodrunner Wrote: If you know Krystanna Wycliffe, ask her to post please. The more the merrier!
|
|
Thanks given by: | |
|
07-23-2016, 11:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2016 11:53 AM by Reven Rosca.)
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
I'm posting two pedigrees courtesy of Krystanna
This one clearly places Galaxy Burst recessive to 18 Carat Gold and Dry Olive
The next places it as recessive to Exotic Journey (Already sent to Saga):
Forum based dominance charts
Tad nailed it!
|
|
Thanks given by: | |
|
07-23-2016, 11:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2016 11:47 AM by Yasmina Quihoxil.)
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
(07-17-2016 05:10 AM)Kayla Woodrunner Wrote: If my analysis is correct (anyone want to confirm?), then this does not prove anything on Galaxy Star vs Galaxy Burst. But you did get a pure Galaxy Star on Eadwiella. I think authentic proven "pures" are rare (vs assumed unproven"pures" which are quite common). Congratulations!
EDIT: I'm blind, I didn't check which genesis eye was passed to the offspring. Never mind me. You're correct, Eadwiella is pure. Silly goose me!
|
|
07-25-2016, 11:53 AM
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
That was a typo, Peaches. I've corrected it.
Forum based dominance charts
Tad nailed it!
|
|
07-25-2016, 12:00 PM
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
I thought so, i deleted my post to avoid confusion. Thank you Reven for all your hard work
|
|
Thanks given by: | |
|
Thanks given by: | |
|
07-26-2016, 02:51 PM
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
You have just placed Galaxy Burst, Inia! Congratulations!
Now we need a second proof. (How tempting it is to offer one's services...)
Forum based dominance charts
Tad nailed it!
|
|
Thanks given by: | |
|
07-26-2016, 07:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-26-2016 09:57 PM by Kayla Woodrunner.)
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
Thank you, Inia! This is cool because we've been seeing this line from the beginning!
Earlier in the thread it was proven Diandra has Galaxy Star hid.
Paired with Delmer, they got a Galaxy Burst kid which proves Delmer has Galaxy Burst hid.
So the kid has Galaxy Burst shown and Galaxy Star hid
Galaxy Burst is dominant to Galaxy Star
earlier it was proven Galaxy Burst is recessive to Exotic Journey
So Galaxy Burst is placed between Exotic Journey and Galaxy Star
Awesome job, Inia! and for showing us your progress in placing it all along the way
lol, Reven, you crack me up!
"In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this." Terry Pratchett
Der Kitty Mill
Latest Born Kitty:
|
|
08-27-2016, 12:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2016 12:52 PM by Arwen Swordthain.)
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
(07-18-2016 09:46 AM)Kayla Woodrunner Wrote: If you know Krystanna Wycliffe, ask her to post please. The more the merrier!
I just found a cat she is selling and if I am correct the age of the cats hiding Galaxy star mean its pure therefore making Galaxy Burst dominant.
Posting a gyazo of the pedigree I found. She is stating as hides Galaxy Star and the pedigree does seem to support that.
This should serve as a second proof.
Forum Based Charts
KittyCats Discoveries & Retirements
|
|
09-02-2016, 04:47 AM
|
|
RE: Galaxy Burst Eyes Recessiveness
I don't know Arwen. If Saga is assuming it's not proven Galaxy Star is not most recessive until Galaxy Burst gets a definitive 2nd proof -- doesn't this proof rest on the assumption Galaxy Star is most recessive? WE know that's true but ti would still need to be "shown". Meaning in this case, the Mom would have to be proven pure Galaxy Star which should be hard to prove since Galaxy Star is the most recessive. If you see what I mean.
"In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this." Terry Pratchett
Der Kitty Mill
Latest Born Kitty:
|
|
Thanks given by: | |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
|
|